rs101_limitexample.C File Reference

Detailed Description

Limits: number counting experiment with uncertainty on both the background rate and signal efficiency.

The usage of a Confidence Interval Calculator to set a limit on the signal is illustrated

 
 
RooWorkspace()  contents
 
variables
---------
(b,gSigBkg,gSigEff,obs,ratioBkgEff,ratioSigEff,s)
 
p.d.f.s
-------
RooGaussian::bkgConstraint[ x=gSigBkg mean=ratioBkgEff sigma=0.2 ] = 1
RooPoisson::countingModel[ x=obs mean=countingModel_2 ] = 0.0325554
RooProdPdf::modelWithConstraints[ countingModel * sigConstraint * bkgConstraint ] = 0.0325554
RooGaussian::sigConstraint[ x=gSigEff mean=ratioSigEff sigma=0.05 ] = 1
 
functions
--------
RooAddition::countingModel_2[ countingModel_2_[s_x_ratioSigEff] + countingModel_2_[b_x_ratioBkgEff] ] = 150
RooProduct::countingModel_2_[b_x_ratioBkgEff][ b * ratioBkgEff ] = 100
RooProduct::countingModel_2_[s_x_ratioSigEff][ s * ratioSigEff ] = 50
 
[#1] INFO:Minimization --  Including the following constraint terms in minimization: (sigConstraint,bkgConstraint)
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- The global observables are not defined , normalize constraints with respect to the parameters (ratioSigEff,ratioBkgEff)
[#1] INFO:Fitting -- RooAddition::defaultErrorLevel(nll_modelWithConstraints_exampleData_with_constr) Summation contains a RooNLLVar, using its error level
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- RooAbsMinimizerFcn::setOptimizeConst: activating const optimization
[#1] INFO:Minimization --  The following expressions will be evaluated in cache-and-track mode: (countingModel)
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- RooAbsMinimizerFcn::setOptimizeConst: deactivating const optimization
[#1] INFO:ObjectHandling -- RooWorkspace::import() importing dataset exampleData
[#1] INFO:InputArguments -- The deprecated RooFit::CloneData(1) option passed to createNLL() is ignored.
[#1] INFO:Minimization --  Including the following constraint terms in minimization: (sigConstraint,bkgConstraint)
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- The following global observables have been defined and their values are taken from the model: (gSigEff,gSigBkg)
[#0] PROGRESS:Minimization -- ProfileLikelihoodCalcultor::DoGLobalFit - find MLE 
[#1] INFO:Fitting -- RooAddition::defaultErrorLevel(nll_modelWithConstraints_exampleData_with_constr) Summation contains a RooNLLVar, using its error level
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- RooAbsMinimizerFcn::setOptimizeConst: activating const optimization
[#1] INFO:Minimization --  The following expressions will be evaluated in cache-and-track mode: (countingModel)
[#0] PROGRESS:Minimization -- ProfileLikelihoodCalcultor::DoMinimizeNLL - using Minuit2 / Migrad with strategy 1
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- 
  RooFitResult: minimized FCN value: 0.689753, estimated distance to minimum: 3.0067e-16
                covariance matrix quality: Full, accurate covariance matrix
                Status : MINIMIZE=0 
 
    Floating Parameter    FinalValue +/-  Error   
  --------------------  --------------------------
           ratioBkgEff    1.0000e+00 +/-  1.99e-01
           ratioSigEff    1.0000e+00 +/-  5.00e-02
                     s    6.0000e+01 +/-  2.32e+01
 
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- RooProfileLL::evaluate(nll_modelWithConstraints_exampleData_with_constr_Profile[s]) Creating instance of MINUIT
[#1] INFO:Fitting -- RooAddition::defaultErrorLevel(nll_modelWithConstraints_exampleData_with_constr) Summation contains a RooNLLVar, using its error level
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- RooProfileLL::evaluate(nll_modelWithConstraints_exampleData_with_constr_Profile[s]) determining minimum likelihood for current configurations w.r.t all observable
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- RooProfileLL::evaluate(nll_modelWithConstraints_exampleData_with_constr_Profile[s]) minimum found at (s=60)
.
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- RooProfileLL::evaluate(nll_modelWithConstraints_exampleData_with_constr_Profile[s]) Creating instance of MINUIT
[#1] INFO:Fitting -- RooAddition::defaultErrorLevel(nll_modelWithConstraints_exampleData_with_constr) Summation contains a RooNLLVar, using its error level
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- RooProfileLL::evaluate(nll_modelWithConstraints_exampleData_with_constr_Profile[s]) determining minimum likelihood for current configurations w.r.t all observable
[#0] ERROR:InputArguments -- RooArgSet::checkForDup: ERROR argument with name s is already in this set
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- RooProfileLL::evaluate(nll_modelWithConstraints_exampleData_with_constr_Profile[s]) minimum found at (s=60)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
=== Using the following for ModelConfig ===
Observables:             RooArgSet:: = (obs)
Parameters of Interest:  RooArgSet:: = (s)
Nuisance Parameters:     RooArgSet:: = (ratioSigEff,ratioBkgEff)
Global Observables:      RooArgSet:: = (gSigEff,gSigBkg)
PDF:                     RooProdPdf::modelWithConstraints[ countingModel * sigConstraint * bkgConstraint ] = 0.00467703
 
FeldmanCousins: ntoys per point: adaptive
FeldmanCousins: nEvents per toy will not fluctuate, will always be 1
FeldmanCousins: Model has nuisance parameters, will do profile construction
FeldmanCousins: # points to test = 100
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 1/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 3.21178
 s=0.6 ratioSigEff=0.999977 ratioBkgEff=1.43644 [-inf, 4.68588]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 2/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 3.08184
 s=1.8 ratioSigEff=1.00018 ratioBkgEff=1.42695 [-inf, 3.7189]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 3/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.95515
 s=3 ratioSigEff=1.00055 ratioBkgEff=1.4177 [-inf, 3.91249]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 4/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.83091
 s=4.2 ratioSigEff=1.00106 ratioBkgEff=1.40849 [-inf, 3.65947]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 5/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.7092
 s=5.4 ratioSigEff=1.00133 ratioBkgEff=1.39956 [-inf, 3.10323]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 6/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.59009
 s=6.6 ratioSigEff=1.00159 ratioBkgEff=1.39061 [-inf, 2.97611]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 7/100 total MC = 240 this test stat = 2.47431
 s=7.8 ratioSigEff=1.00103 ratioBkgEff=1.38085 [-inf, 3.25381]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 8/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.36072
 s=9 ratioSigEff=1.00135 ratioBkgEff=1.37176 [-inf, 2.92354]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 9/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.24982
 s=10.2 ratioSigEff=1.00166 ratioBkgEff=1.36273 [-inf, 3.4069]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 10/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.14164
 s=11.4 ratioSigEff=1.00196 ratioBkgEff=1.35375 [-inf, 3.07011]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 11/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.03623
 s=12.6 ratioSigEff=1.00273 ratioBkgEff=1.34407 [-inf, 3.24614]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 12/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.93333
 s=13.8 ratioSigEff=1.00294 ratioBkgEff=1.3353 [-inf, 2.4475]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 13/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.83331
 s=15 ratioSigEff=1.00231 ratioBkgEff=1.32686 [-inf, 2.70017]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 14/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.73555
 s=16.2 ratioSigEff=1.00258 ratioBkgEff=1.31793 [-inf, 2.77026]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 15/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.64101
 s=17.4 ratioSigEff=1.00283 ratioBkgEff=1.30905 [-inf, 2.84104]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 16/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.54913
 s=18.6 ratioSigEff=1.00364 ratioBkgEff=1.29912 [-inf, 2.44366]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 17/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.45967
 s=19.8 ratioSigEff=1.0038 ratioBkgEff=1.29047 [-inf, 2.51046]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 18/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.3729
 s=21 ratioSigEff=1.00395 ratioBkgEff=1.2818 [-inf, 2.3088]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 19/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.28897
 s=22.2 ratioSigEff=1.00408 ratioBkgEff=1.2731 [-inf, 2.28612]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 20/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.20763
 s=23.4 ratioSigEff=1.0042 ratioBkgEff=1.26438 [-inf, 2.0941]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 21/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.12898
 s=24.6 ratioSigEff=1.00431 ratioBkgEff=1.25563 [-inf, 2.07266]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 22/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.05305
 s=25.8 ratioSigEff=1.0044 ratioBkgEff=1.24688 [-inf, 2.4819]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 23/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.979804
 s=27 ratioSigEff=1.00448 ratioBkgEff=1.2381 [-inf, 1.94868]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 24/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.909232
 s=28.2 ratioSigEff=1.00454 ratioBkgEff=1.22932 [-inf, 2.09127]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 25/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.841264
 s=29.4 ratioSigEff=1.00408 ratioBkgEff=1.22097 [-inf, 1.9082]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 26/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.776027
 s=30.6 ratioSigEff=1.00408 ratioBkgEff=1.21214 [-inf, 2.04865]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 27/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.713453
 s=31.8 ratioSigEff=1.00406 ratioBkgEff=1.2033 [-inf, 1.4258]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 28/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.653398
 s=33 ratioSigEff=1.00403 ratioBkgEff=1.19446 [-inf, 1.92614]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 29/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.596234
 s=34.2 ratioSigEff=1.00399 ratioBkgEff=1.18562 [-inf, 1.53064]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 30/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.541678
 s=35.4 ratioSigEff=1.00393 ratioBkgEff=1.17679 [-inf, 1.65725]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 31/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.489749
 s=36.6 ratioSigEff=1.00386 ratioBkgEff=1.16795 [-inf, 1.42567]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 32/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.440357
 s=37.8 ratioSigEff=1.00378 ratioBkgEff=1.15913 [-inf, 1.40855]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 33/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.393811
 s=39 ratioSigEff=1.00369 ratioBkgEff=1.15032 [-inf, 1.2593]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 34/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.349798
 s=40.2 ratioSigEff=1.00358 ratioBkgEff=1.14152 [-inf, 1.30825]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 35/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.30842
 s=41.4 ratioSigEff=1.00347 ratioBkgEff=1.13274 [-inf, 0.874179]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 36/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.269673
 s=42.6 ratioSigEff=1.00334 ratioBkgEff=1.12398 [-inf, 1.14949]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 37/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.233551
 s=43.8 ratioSigEff=1.00319 ratioBkgEff=1.11573 [-inf, 1.07403]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 38/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.200042
 s=45 ratioSigEff=1.00303 ratioBkgEff=1.10705 [-inf, 1.30848]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 39/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.169154
 s=46.2 ratioSigEff=1.00285 ratioBkgEff=1.09838 [-inf, 0.987229]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 40/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.140876
 s=47.4 ratioSigEff=1.00267 ratioBkgEff=1.08972 [-inf, 0.917557]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 41/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.115202
 s=48.6 ratioSigEff=1.00247 ratioBkgEff=1.08109 [-inf, 0.850481]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 42/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.0921253
 s=49.8 ratioSigEff=1.00226 ratioBkgEff=1.07247 [-inf, 0.891152]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 43/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.0716406
 s=51 ratioSigEff=1.00204 ratioBkgEff=1.06387 [-inf, 1.04631]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 44/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.0537413
 s=52.2 ratioSigEff=1.00181 ratioBkgEff=1.05529 [-inf, 0.574131]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 45/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.0384208
 s=53.4 ratioSigEff=1.00156 ratioBkgEff=1.04672 [-inf, 0.749926]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 46/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.0256726
 s=54.6 ratioSigEff=1.00131 ratioBkgEff=1.03818 [-inf, 0.839739]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 47/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.0154897
 s=55.8 ratioSigEff=1.00104 ratioBkgEff=1.02966 [-inf, 0.715031]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 48/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.00786498
 s=57 ratioSigEff=1.00075 ratioBkgEff=1.02116 [-inf, 0.574092]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 49/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.00303984
 s=58.2 ratioSigEff=1.00144 ratioBkgEff=1.01171 [-inf, 0.731975]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 50/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.000296146
 s=59.4 ratioSigEff=1.00049 ratioBkgEff=1.00388 [-inf, 0.692058]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 51/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.000277435
 s=60.6 ratioSigEff=0.999518 ratioBkgEff=0.996076 [-inf, 0.645915]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 52/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.00297546
 s=61.8 ratioSigEff=0.998533 ratioBkgEff=0.988319 [-inf, 0.513395]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 53/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.00784733
 s=63 ratioSigEff=0.999173 ratioBkgEff=0.978981 [-inf, 0.477501]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 54/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.0154172
 s=64.2 ratioSigEff=0.998823 ratioBkgEff=0.970615 [-inf, 0.721422]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 55/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.0254769
 s=65.4 ratioSigEff=0.998461 ratioBkgEff=0.962272 [-inf, 0.678264]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 56/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.0380399
 s=66.6 ratioSigEff=0.998088 ratioBkgEff=0.953953 [-inf, 0.636603]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 57/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.0530874
 s=67.8 ratioSigEff=0.997704 ratioBkgEff=0.945659 [-inf, 0.596425]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 58/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.0706058
 s=69 ratioSigEff=0.997308 ratioBkgEff=0.93739 [-inf, 0.70275]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 59/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.0905894
 s=70.2 ratioSigEff=0.996902 ratioBkgEff=0.929146 [-inf, 0.93255]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 60/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.11303
 s=71.4 ratioSigEff=0.996485 ratioBkgEff=0.920929 [-inf, 1.06482]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 61/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.137918
 s=72.6 ratioSigEff=0.996058 ratioBkgEff=0.912737 [-inf, 0.780337]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 62/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.165246
 s=73.8 ratioSigEff=0.995619 ratioBkgEff=0.904572 [-inf, 0.684448]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 63/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.195001
 s=75 ratioSigEff=0.99517 ratioBkgEff=0.896433 [-inf, 1.03027]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 64/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.227176
 s=76.2 ratioSigEff=0.99471 ratioBkgEff=0.888322 [-inf, 0.978263]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 65/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.261776
 s=77.4 ratioSigEff=0.99424 ratioBkgEff=0.880239 [-inf, 1.11256]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 66/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.298772
 s=78.6 ratioSigEff=0.99376 ratioBkgEff=0.872183 [-inf, 1.18776]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 67/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.338144
 s=79.8 ratioSigEff=0.993269 ratioBkgEff=0.864156 [-inf, 1.48101]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 68/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.379914
 s=81 ratioSigEff=0.992769 ratioBkgEff=0.856157 [-inf, 1.56755]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 69/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.424071
 s=82.2 ratioSigEff=0.992258 ratioBkgEff=0.848187 [-inf, 1.21708]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 70/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.470561
 s=83.4 ratioSigEff=0.991737 ratioBkgEff=0.840247 [-inf, 1.43809]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 71/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.519388
 s=84.6 ratioSigEff=0.991206 ratioBkgEff=0.832336 [-inf, 1.84094]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 72/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.570571
 s=85.8 ratioSigEff=0.990665 ratioBkgEff=0.824455 [-inf, 1.31514]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 73/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.624119
 s=87 ratioSigEff=0.990114 ratioBkgEff=0.816605 [-inf, 1.18918]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 74/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.679954
 s=88.2 ratioSigEff=0.989554 ratioBkgEff=0.808785 [-inf, 1.33503]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 75/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.738105
 s=89.4 ratioSigEff=0.988984 ratioBkgEff=0.800996 [-inf, 1.56456]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 76/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.798548
 s=90.6 ratioSigEff=0.988404 ratioBkgEff=0.793239 [-inf, 1.49965]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 77/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.861306
 s=91.8 ratioSigEff=0.987815 ratioBkgEff=0.785512 [-inf, 1.66275]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 78/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.926319
 s=93 ratioSigEff=0.987217 ratioBkgEff=0.777818 [-inf, 1.44643]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 79/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 0.993583
 s=94.2 ratioSigEff=0.98661 ratioBkgEff=0.770156 [-inf, 2.19051]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 80/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.06308
 s=95.4 ratioSigEff=0.985993 ratioBkgEff=0.762527 [-inf, 1.54054]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 81/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.13458
 s=96.6 ratioSigEff=0.985367 ratioBkgEff=0.75493 [-inf, 1.86615]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 82/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.20859
 s=97.8 ratioSigEff=0.984732 ratioBkgEff=0.747367 [-inf, 2.40993]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 83/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.28501
 s=99 ratioSigEff=0.984088 ratioBkgEff=0.739836 [-inf, 2.32724]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 84/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.36342
 s=100.2 ratioSigEff=0.983435 ratioBkgEff=0.73234 [-inf, 2.43281]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 85/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.44405
 s=101.4 ratioSigEff=0.982773 ratioBkgEff=0.724877 [-inf, 2.44403]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 86/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.52687
 s=102.6 ratioSigEff=0.982103 ratioBkgEff=0.717449 [-inf, 2.09032]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 87/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.61182
 s=103.8 ratioSigEff=0.981424 ratioBkgEff=0.710056 [-inf, 2.76135]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 88/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.69896
 s=105 ratioSigEff=0.980736 ratioBkgEff=0.702697 [-inf, 2.38331]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 89/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.78823
 s=106.2 ratioSigEff=0.98004 ratioBkgEff=0.695373 [-inf, 2.39444]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 90/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.87929
 s=107.4 ratioSigEff=0.979335 ratioBkgEff=0.688084 [-inf, 2.89798]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 91/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 1.97313
 s=108.6 ratioSigEff=0.978622 ratioBkgEff=0.680832 [-inf, 3.1204]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 92/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.06825
 s=109.8 ratioSigEff=0.977383 ratioBkgEff=0.670641 [-inf, 3.13169]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 93/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.16592
 s=111 ratioSigEff=0.976625 ratioBkgEff=0.663286 [-inf, 2.93195]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 94/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.26567
 s=112.2 ratioSigEff=0.975857 ratioBkgEff=0.655962 [-inf, 2.54424]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 95/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.36747
 s=113.4 ratioSigEff=0.975049 ratioBkgEff=0.648489 [-inf, 3.05911]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 96/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.47112
 s=114.6 ratioSigEff=0.97426 ratioBkgEff=0.641206 [-inf, 2.96555]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 97/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.57725
 s=115.8 ratioSigEff=0.973462 ratioBkgEff=0.633952 [-inf, 3.5205]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 98/100 total MC = 240 this test stat = 2.68512
 s=117 ratioSigEff=0.972655 ratioBkgEff=0.626728 [-inf, 3.19934]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 99/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.79507
 s=118.2 ratioSigEff=0.971839 ratioBkgEff=0.619534 [-inf, 3.77433]  in interval = 1
 
NeymanConstruction: Prog: 100/100 total MC = 80 this test stat = 2.90706
 s=119.4 ratioSigEff=0.971013 ratioBkgEff=0.61237 [-inf, 3.66884]  in interval = 1
 
[#1] INFO:Eval -- 100 points in interval
 
[#1] INFO:Minimization --  Including the following constraint terms in minimization: (sigConstraint,bkgConstraint)
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- The global observables are not defined , normalize constraints with respect to the parameters (b,ratioBkgEff,ratioSigEff,s)
[#1] INFO:Fitting -- RooAddition::defaultErrorLevel(nll_modelWithConstraints_exampleData_with_constr) Summation contains a RooNLLVar, using its error level
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- RooAbsMinimizerFcn::setOptimizeConst: activating const optimization
[#1] INFO:Minimization --  The following expressions will be evaluated in cache-and-track mode: (countingModel)
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- RooAbsMinimizerFcn::setOptimizeConst: deactivating const optimization
[#1] INFO:Minimization --  Including the following constraint terms in minimization: (sigConstraint,bkgConstraint)
[#1] INFO:Minimization -- The following global observables have been defined and their values are taken from the model: (gSigEff,gSigBkg)
Metropolis-Hastings progress: ....................................................................................................
[#1] INFO:Eval -- Proposal acceptance rate: 48.165%
[#1] INFO:Eval -- Number of steps in chain: 9633
Profile lower limit on s = 13.9497
Profile upper limit on s = 107.95
FC lower limit on s = 0.6
FC upper limit on s = 119.4
MCMC lower limit on s = 19.471
MCMC upper limit on s = 104.448
MCMC Actual confidence level: 0.950015
plotting the chain data - nentries = 9633
plotting the scanned points used in the frequentist construction - npoints = 100
Real time 0:00:10, CP time 10.380

 
#include "RooProfileLL.h"
#include "RooAbsPdf.h"
#include "RooStats/HypoTestResult.h"
#include "RooRealVar.h"
#include "RooPlot.h"
#include "RooDataSet.h"
#include "RooTreeDataStore.h"
#include "TTree.h"
#include "TCanvas.h"
#include "TLine.h"
#include "TStopwatch.h"
 
#include "RooStats/ProfileLikelihoodCalculator.h"
#include "RooStats/MCMCCalculator.h"
#include "RooStats/UniformProposal.h"
#include "RooStats/FeldmanCousins.h"
#include "RooStats/NumberCountingPdfFactory.h"
#include "RooStats/ConfInterval.h"
#include "RooStats/PointSetInterval.h"
#include "RooStats/LikelihoodInterval.h"
#include "RooStats/LikelihoodIntervalPlot.h"
#include "RooStats/RooStatsUtils.h"
#include "RooStats/ModelConfig.h"
#include "RooStats/MCMCInterval.h"
#include "RooStats/MCMCIntervalPlot.h"
#include "RooStats/ProposalFunction.h"
#include "RooStats/ProposalHelper.h"
#include "RooFitResult.h"
#include "TGraph2D.h"
 
#include <cassert>
 
// use this order for safety on library loading
using namespace RooFit;
using namespace RooStats;
 
void rs101_limitexample()
{
   // --------------------------------------
   // An example of setting a limit in a number counting experiment with uncertainty on background and signal
 
   // to time the macro
   TStopwatch t;
   t.Start();
 
   // --------------------------------------
   // The Model building stage
   // --------------------------------------
   RooWorkspace wspace{};
   wspace.factory("Poisson::countingModel(obs[150,0,300], "
                   "sum(s[50,0,120]*ratioSigEff[1.,0,3.],b[100]*ratioBkgEff[1.,0.,3.]))"); // counting model
   //  wspace.factory("Gaussian::sigConstraint(ratioSigEff,1,0.05)"); // 5% signal efficiency uncertainty
   //  wspace.factory("Gaussian::bkgConstraint(ratioBkgEff,1,0.1)"); // 10% background efficiency uncertainty
   wspace.factory("Gaussian::sigConstraint(gSigEff[1,0,3],ratioSigEff,0.05)"); // 5% signal efficiency uncertainty
   wspace.factory("Gaussian::bkgConstraint(gSigBkg[1,0,3],ratioBkgEff,0.2)");  // 10% background efficiency uncertainty
   wspace.factory("PROD::modelWithConstraints(countingModel,sigConstraint,bkgConstraint)"); // product of terms
   wspace.Print();
 
   RooAbsPdf *modelWithConstraints = wspace.pdf("modelWithConstraints"); // get the model
   RooRealVar *obs = wspace.var("obs");                                  // get the observable
   RooRealVar *s = wspace.var("s");                                      // get the signal we care about
   RooRealVar *b =
      wspace.var("b"); // get the background and set it to a constant.  Uncertainty included in ratioBkgEff
   b->setConstant();
 
   RooRealVar *ratioSigEff = wspace.var("ratioSigEff"); // get uncertain parameter to constrain
   RooRealVar *ratioBkgEff = wspace.var("ratioBkgEff"); // get uncertain parameter to constrain
   RooArgSet constrainedParams(*ratioSigEff,
                               *ratioBkgEff); // need to constrain these in the fit (should change default behavior)
 
   RooRealVar *gSigEff = wspace.var("gSigEff"); // global observables for signal efficiency
   RooRealVar *gSigBkg = wspace.var("gSigBkg"); // global obs for background efficiency
   gSigEff->setConstant();
   gSigBkg->setConstant();
 
   // Create an example dataset with 160 observed events
   obs->setVal(160.);
   RooDataSet data{"exampleData", "exampleData", *obs};
   data.add(*obs);
 
   RooArgSet all(*s, *ratioBkgEff, *ratioSigEff);
 
   // not necessary
   modelWithConstraints->fitTo(data, Constrain({*ratioSigEff, *ratioBkgEff}), PrintLevel(-1));
 
   // Now let's make some confidence intervals for s, our parameter of interest
   RooArgSet paramOfInterest(*s);
 
   ModelConfig modelConfig(&wspace);
   modelConfig.SetPdf(*modelWithConstraints);
   modelConfig.SetParametersOfInterest(paramOfInterest);
   modelConfig.SetNuisanceParameters(constrainedParams);
   modelConfig.SetObservables(*obs);
   modelConfig.SetGlobalObservables(RooArgSet(*gSigEff, *gSigBkg));
   modelConfig.SetName("ModelConfig");
   wspace.import(modelConfig);
   wspace.import(data);
   wspace.SetName("w");
   wspace.writeToFile("rs101_ws.root");
 
   // First, let's use a Calculator based on the Profile Likelihood Ratio
   // ProfileLikelihoodCalculator plc(data, *modelWithConstraints, paramOfInterest);
   ProfileLikelihoodCalculator plc(data, modelConfig);
   plc.SetTestSize(.05);
   std::unique_ptr<LikelihoodInterval> lrinterval{static_cast<LikelihoodInterval*>(plc.GetInterval())};
 
   // Let's make a plot
   auto dataCanvas = new TCanvas("dataCanvas");
   dataCanvas->Divide(2, 1);
 
   dataCanvas->cd(1);
   LikelihoodIntervalPlot plotInt(lrinterval.get());
   plotInt.SetTitle("Profile Likelihood Ratio and Posterior for S");
   plotInt.Draw();
 
   // Second, use a Calculator based on the Feldman Cousins technique
   FeldmanCousins fc(data, modelConfig);
   fc.UseAdaptiveSampling(true);
   fc.FluctuateNumDataEntries(false); // number counting analysis: dataset always has 1 entry with N events observed
   fc.SetNBins(100);                  // number of points to test per parameter
   fc.SetTestSize(.05);
   //  fc.SaveBeltToFile(true); // optional
   std::unique_ptr<PointSetInterval> fcint{static_cast<PointSetInterval*>(fc.GetInterval())};
 
   std::unique_ptr<RooFitResult> fit{modelWithConstraints->fitTo(data, Save(true), PrintLevel(-1))};
 
   // Third, use a Calculator based on Markov Chain monte carlo
   // Before configuring the calculator, let's make a ProposalFunction
   // that will achieve a high acceptance rate
   ProposalHelper ph;
   ph.SetVariables((RooArgSet &)fit->floatParsFinal());
   ph.SetCovMatrix(fit->covarianceMatrix());
   ph.SetUpdateProposalParameters(true);
   ph.SetCacheSize(100);
   ProposalFunction *pdfProp = ph.GetProposalFunction();
 
   MCMCCalculator mc(data, modelConfig);
   mc.SetNumIters(20000);    // steps to propose in the chain
   mc.SetTestSize(.05);      // 95% CL
   mc.SetNumBurnInSteps(40); // ignore first N steps in chain as "burn in"
   mc.SetProposalFunction(*pdfProp);
   mc.SetLeftSideTailFraction(0.5);                        // find a "central" interval
   std::unique_ptr<MCMCInterval> mcInt{static_cast<MCMCInterval *>(mc.GetInterval())};
 
   // Get Lower and Upper limits from Profile Calculator
   std::cout << "Profile lower limit on s = " << lrinterval->LowerLimit(*s) << std::endl;
   std::cout << "Profile upper limit on s = " << lrinterval->UpperLimit(*s) << std::endl;
 
   // Get Lower and Upper limits from FeldmanCousins with profile construction
   if (fcint) {
      double fcul = fcint->UpperLimit(*s);
      double fcll = fcint->LowerLimit(*s);
      std::cout << "FC lower limit on s = " << fcll << std::endl;
      std::cout << "FC upper limit on s = " << fcul << std::endl;
      auto fcllLine = new TLine(fcll, 0, fcll, 1);
      auto fculLine = new TLine(fcul, 0, fcul, 1);
      fcllLine->SetLineColor(kRed);
      fculLine->SetLineColor(kRed);
      fcllLine->Draw("same");
      fculLine->Draw("same");
      dataCanvas->Update();
   }
 
   // Plot MCMC interval and print some statistics
   MCMCIntervalPlot mcPlot(*mcInt);
   mcPlot.SetLineColor(kMagenta);
   mcPlot.SetLineWidth(2);
   mcPlot.Draw("same");
 
   double mcul = mcInt->UpperLimit(*s);
   double mcll = mcInt->LowerLimit(*s);
   std::cout << "MCMC lower limit on s = " << mcll << std::endl;
   std::cout << "MCMC upper limit on s = " << mcul << std::endl;
   std::cout << "MCMC Actual confidence level: " << mcInt->GetActualConfidenceLevel() << std::endl;
 
   // 3-d plot of the parameter points
   dataCanvas->cd(2);
   // also plot the points in the markov chain
   RooDataSet *chainData = mcInt->GetChainAsDataSet();
 
   assert(chainData);
   std::cout << "plotting the chain data - nentries = " << chainData->numEntries() << std::endl;
   TTree *chain = RooStats::GetAsTTree("chainTreeData", "chainTreeData", *chainData);
   assert(chain);
   chain->SetMarkerStyle(6);
   chain->SetMarkerColor(kRed);
 
   chain->Draw("s:ratioSigEff:ratioBkgEff", "nll_MarkovChain_local_", "box"); // 3-d box proportional to posterior
 
   // the points used in the profile construction
   RooDataSet *parScanData = (RooDataSet *)fc.GetPointsToScan();
   assert(parScanData);
   std::cout << "plotting the scanned points used in the frequentist construction - npoints = "
             << parScanData->numEntries() << std::endl;
   // getting the tree and drawing it -crashes (very strange....);
   // TTree* parameterScan =  RooStats::GetAsTTree("parScanTreeData","parScanTreeData",*parScanData);
   // assert(parameterScan);
   // parameterScan->Draw("s:ratioSigEff:ratioBkgEff","","goff");
   auto gr = new TGraph2D(parScanData->numEntries());
   for (int ievt = 0; ievt < parScanData->numEntries(); ++ievt) {
      const RooArgSet *evt = parScanData->get(ievt);
      double x = evt->getRealValue("ratioBkgEff");
      double y = evt->getRealValue("ratioSigEff");
      double z = evt->getRealValue("s");
      gr->SetPoint(ievt, x, y, z);
      // std::cout << ievt << "  " << x << "  " << y << "  " << z << std::endl;
   }
   gr->SetMarkerStyle(24);
   gr->Draw("P SAME");
 
   // print timing info
   t.Stop();
   t.Print();
}

Author

Kyle Cranmer

Definition in file rs101_limitexample.C.