RE: known bug in h2root/makeclass ?

From: Olivier Couet <Olivier.Couet_at_cern.ch>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:52:17 +0100


Yes, very likely the Ntuple declaration (HBNAME etc ..) was not matching the common blocks...
Cheers,
Olivier

-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastien Binet
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 2:31 PM To: Olivier Couet; roottalk_at_root.cern.ch Subject: RE: [ROOT] known bug in h2root/makeclass ?

On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:07:06 +0100, Olivier Couet <Olivier.Couet_at_cern.ch> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just had a look at the original ntuple in atlfast_500.ntup.
> In PAW I did:
>
> Hi/file 0 atlfast_500.ntup
> Nt/print 3333
>
> It tells me that both ACCHW and STATEHW are R*4 So MakeClass is right
> making them Float_t

ok.
probably a mis-hap' in the original fortran code which produced that ntuple (I don't have that part unfortunately...)

thanks for checking.

-s

--
#########################################
# Dr. Sebastien Binet
# Laboratoire de l'Accelerateur Lineaire # Universite Paris-Sud XI #
Batiment 200 # 91898 Orsay #########################################
Received on Thu Jan 27 2011 - 14:52:22 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jan 27 2011 - 23:50:01 CET