Yes, something has obviously been fixed since v5.20. (We just released
5.26).
Do you need to know when it was fix of, knowing it is now fixed is
enough for you ?
Cheers,
Olivier
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Mann [mailto:amann_at_uni-goettingen.de]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 4:19 PM
To: Olivier Couet
Subject: Re: [ROOT] strange behaviour of P0 drawing option of TGraph2D
Sorry for the delay in my reply.
No, I don't get the same plots, see attachment.
Your plots look OK though. So this is fixed in some later result? v5.20 is probably out-dated somehow...
cu,
Alexander
Olivier Couet schrieb:
> I looked more closely at the images generated by your macro using the
> latest root version. And seems to me it is ok. Look at the highest
> point its position is near 3000 in both plots...
> do you obtain the same plots as me ?
>
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Alexander Mann wrote:
>
>> Hello, >> >> I found a strange behaviour of the "P0" option when plotting TGraph2d(v5.20).
>> If you execute the macro in the attachment once with "surf1" as draw >> option in line 85 and once with "tri1", and then compare the >> resulting drawings, you'll find that the small white circles >> indicating the data points are at the same position for both graphs,whereas the grid and the tics of the axes change. >> I.e. the value read off for the markers changes although it should be
>> the same in both cases as the data is the same. >> >> Is this a bug in the visualisation or do I misinterpret the meaning >> of the markers? >> >> Best regards, >> Alexander >>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Dec 17 2009 - 17:50:02 CET