RE: Subscript placing

ROOT latex is different on many points. I think that is a minor problem.

-- 
Org:    CERN - European Laboratory for Particle Physics.
Mail:   1211 Geneve 23 - Switzerland                     Mailbox: J25910

E-Mail: Olivier.Couet_at_cern.ch                            Phone:   +41 22
7676522
WWW:    http://cern.ch/Olivier.Couet/                    Fax:     +41 22
7670300

-----Original Message-----
From: Nesterov Stanislav [mailto:qleap_at_pnpi.spb.ru] 
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 10:36 AM
To: Olivier Couet
Cc: roottalk_at_pcroot.cern.ch
Subject: Re: [ROOT] Subscript placing

Oh... Now I see you are right! Thank you!

But can this "confusion" be fixed? In original (Knuth) TeX one doesn't
have to bother about placing _ or ^ with empty sub(super)script to get
correct placing. Are the ROOT TLatex algorithm and TeX algorithm very
different?

--
    Best regards,
    Stanislav.

 On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Olivier Couet wrote:



> 

> The sum symbol is waiting a lower and upper limit, you haven't give

any, 


> that's why it gets confused. Try:

> 

> #sum_{}^{} (#vec{p}_{t})

> 

> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Nesterov Stanislav wrote:

> 

> > Hello,

> > 

> > Is there any way to put subscript letter 't' in TLatex formula like

"#sum 


> > (#vec{p}_{t})" in a right place?

> > Now I can see 't' too much below the baseline of 'p' letter. But if

I am 


> > drawing "#vec{p}_{t}" then it is in place as it should be (more or

less).


> > 

> > 

> 

>