Hi Matt, Thanks for sending your changes to the Makefile. I am surprised to see so many bugs in the MS .NET compiler. I imported most of your minor changes to the Makefile for the cleanup process. I also took your changes to the Makefile.win32 and incorporated the same mods in Makefile.win32gdk. I did not take your patch for TTreeFormulaManager.h. I do not want to mess a class because of a MS compiler bug. I changed the destructor to be public instead for all cases. (a pity) I did not take your mods to degrade the optimisation level when compiling TStreamerInfo. Compiling this class with optimisation is very important. We may introduce a case for Windows in general to compile this class with no optmisation. To be discussed. Now in CVS. We do not intend to provide binaries in the short term (next few weeks) for .NET. I encourage Axel in his suggestion to see if binaries compiled under VC++6 work also in the .NET environment. Rene Brun Axel Naumann wrote: > > Hi, > > Do we need a dedicated .net binary? Or is it sufficient to have the code > patched such that it builds under .net and only have a vc6 binary > version? I believe we should first test whether the root vc6 binaries > work with .net (e.g. aclic needs to be tested); I don't know of any a > priori reason why that shouldn't work. Can someone do that? (I'd > volunteer to do this over the weekend, incorporating Matt's diff into > current cvs sources, but maybe someone else is faster.) > > Cheers, Axel. > > GENTIT Francois-Xavier DAPNIA wrote: > > Dear members of the ROOT team, > > I am waiting upon ROOT being distributed for Visual C++.net to install it > > on my PC. I see that it works, seing the message on ROOTTALK by Matthew D. > > Langston. Do you intend to make a download version of ROOT for Visual > > C++.net? > > > > François-Xavier Gentit > > DAPNIA/SPP CEA Saclay > > http://gentit.home.cern.ch/gentit/ > > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:50:09 MET