Update: Re: [ROOT] ROOT + GCC 3.2 seems okay.

From: Brett Viren (bv@bnl.gov)
Date: Tue Aug 20 2002 - 13:02:48 MEST

Next message: Thomas Bretz: "Re: [ROOT] Form on Alpha OSF"
Previous message: Jiri Masik: "Re: [ROOT] Form on Alpha OSF"
In reply to: Brett Viren: "[ROOT] ROOT + GCC 3.2 seems okay."
Next in thread: Fons Rademakers: "Re: Update: Re: [ROOT] ROOT + GCC 3.2 seems okay."
Reply: Fons Rademakers: "Re: Update: Re: [ROOT] ROOT + GCC 3.2 seems okay."
Reply: Brett Viren: "[ROOT] Update2: cintdlls fails to build with GCC 3.1.1 & 3.2 (Was: ROOT + GCC 3.2 seems okay.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Brett Viren writes:
 > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.2/../../../crt1.o(.text+0x18): undefined
 > reference to `main'

It turns out that libg2c's main() has been moved into libfrtbegin, at
least in Debian's g77-3.2.  So adding -lfrtbegin to the F77LIBS
variable in config/Makefile.linux allows g2root to link.

-Brett.

Next message: Thomas Bretz: "Re: [ROOT] Form on Alpha OSF"
Previous message: Jiri Masik: "Re: [ROOT] Form on Alpha OSF"
In reply to: Brett Viren: "[ROOT] ROOT + GCC 3.2 seems okay."
Next in thread: Fons Rademakers: "Re: Update: Re: [ROOT] ROOT + GCC 3.2 seems okay."
Reply: Fons Rademakers: "Re: Update: Re: [ROOT] ROOT + GCC 3.2 seems okay."
Reply: Brett Viren: "[ROOT] Update2: cintdlls fails to build with GCC 3.1.1 & 3.2 (Was: ROOT + GCC 3.2 seems okay.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 04 2003 - 23:51:05 MET