Dear Otto, > Hi Thomas, > I didnt follow all your discussion. Could it be that your macro is too > long? At some point (I guess at about 500 lines) the cint buffer which > keeps the byte code gets full then cint starts interpreting instead of > running the "compiled" code and this is of course very slow > thanks for your sugestion. The investigations showed, that the problem lies somewhere between root and X11 (see priror mails). In the batch mode (root -b) I don't have any performance degradations. Back to your suggestion: My macro consists of 350 lines, which should be small enough. Thanks Thomas
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:43:29 MET